Refresh Checked Unchecked Menu Search Shopping bag Geolocation Person Facebook Instagram Twitter YouTube Info Icon CBC Icon CBC Shape CBD Icon CBD Shape CBG Icon CBG Shape THC Icon THC Shape THCV Icon THCV Shape
Advertise on Leafly

4 Lessons Alcohol Prohibition Should Teach Us About Cannabis

January 4, 2017
It’s difficult to predict what the next four years will look like for cannabis users. While President-elect Trump has made a number of contradictory statements on the subject of legalization, his pick for Attorney General, Sen. Jeff Sessions, holds some radical viewpoints, once claiming, “Good people don’t smoke marijuana.”

Related

Trump Picks Jeff Sessions as Attorney General, Stoking Fears of Cannabis Crackdown

This isn’t the first event of this nature in U.S. history. Producing insurmountable suffering and hardship, the so-called ‘Prohibition Period’ between 1920-1933 – referring to the 13-year ban on alcohol – was largely regarded as a large-scale political failure. Cannabis prohibition has yielded similar consequences, with both events leading to an influx in organized crime, attacks on minorities, and ironically, a rise in drug use.

Recognizing the parallels between these two time periods can help us make informed decisions about the future, no matter what our political alignments may happen to be. So what lessons can we take from America’s first prohibition?

1. Crime Increases 

Anti-Alcohol Prohibition Parade, Newark NJ, Oct. 28, 1932

Women turn out in large numbers, some carrying placards reading “We want beer,” for the anti-prohibition parade and demonstration in Newark, N.J., Oct. 28, 1932. More than 20,000 people took part in the mass demand for the repeal of the 18th Amendment. (AP Photo)

Despite its negative reputation, alcohol prohibition was by some measures a success. The 18th amendment was popular for the majority of its duration, and Americans consumed significantly less alcohol. The benefits, however, were not without serious drawbacks. Organized crime groups thrived in territory that legitimate businesses were no longer allowed to inhabit. Prices of liquor spiked, the federal prisoner population multiplied, and the nation lost out on valuable tax dollars.

Because cannabis only became popular after it was made illegal, it’s a lot more difficult to determine exactly how much of an impact its prohibition has on crime rates. According to the American Civil Liberties Union, over 8 million Americans were arrested for cannabis-related crimes between 2001 and 2010. To this day, half of all drug arrests are marijuana-related, with enforcement costing taxpayers around $3.6 billion a year.

Related

Smuggler’s Blues: US Legalization is Crashing Mexico’s Cartel Market

The crime doesn’t stop at the border, though. Cannabis trafficking has historically been the bread and butter of Mexican gangs. According to the Washington Post, cartels reaped in a total of about $8.6 billion from the plant in 2006 alone. Mexico’s Drug War has resulted in staggering tragedy; some experts estimate that by 2013, 120,000 people had died as a direct result of it. A few years ago, illegal cannabis sales made up 20-30% of overall cartel revenue. Thanks to legalization efforts, however, these numbers have dropped significantly. A change in government policy has real potential to destroy a financial cornerstone of violent criminal organizations.

2. Racial Inequality

Whiskey crates during the alcohol prohibition

Authorities unload cases of whiskey crates labeled as green tomatoes from a refrigerator car in the Washington yards on May 15, 1929. The grower’s express cargo train was en route from Holandale, Fla., to Newark, N.J. (AP Photo)

The passage of the 18th Amendment was largely thanks to an activist group called the Anti-Saloon League. Though certainly not the first prohibitionist group in America, the ASL stood out by way of its single-minded approach to policy. Taking no stance on issues unrelated to alcohol, the ASL garnered support from a range of organizations with conflicting values: African labor unions, women’s rights groups, and most notably, the Ku Klux Klan.

When alcohol was banned, the KKK flourished. Overwhelmed with gang-related crime, a number of southern counties appealed to the hate group to act as additional police support, transforming them into vigilante enforcers of the law. The Klan was known to raid the homes of immigrants, illegally collect evidence, and occasionally burn down buildings in the name of abstinence. Unfortunately, their strict anti-alcohol stance and ruthless methods attracted a positive image for the hate group during the mid-1920’s. The Klan reached peak popularity during this time, with an estimated total of between 4 and 5 million members.

Related

This One Chart Captures Everything Wrong With NYC Cannabis Arrests

The enforcement of cannabis has caused significantly disproportionate damage on minority communities. In fact, John Ehrlichman, Nixon’s Chief Domestic Advisor, allegedly once claimed that the introduction of harsher drug penalties was a method of further targeting the administration’s two political enemies: the “antiwar left and black people.” Ehrlichman passed away nearly two decades before the interview was published, leaving no witnesses to verify the validity of these admissions. Federal crime statistics, however, speak volumes in corroboration with this story. Though blacks and whites use roughly the same amount of cannabis, blacks are nearly four times more likely to be arrested for possession.

3. Harm Reduction

Alcohol Prohibition Research Committee

Five members of the alcohol Prohibition Research Committee depart on the bus Diogenes, named after the man who sought in vain for an honest man, in New York City, June 1, 1932. The membership is seeking one drunk who has been reformed by the 18th amendment in their campaign against the liquor ban. From left are Stephen Duggan Jr., assistant investigator; Russell Salmon, chief investigator; Ernest Boorland Jr., member of the executive committee; Robert Nicholson, assistant director; and Paul Morris, director. (AP Photo)

Research suggests that drug choices are heavily influenced by availability – the more readily a person can access a drug, the more likely they are to use it. Applying a blanket ban on a substance, however, can produce harmful consequences. A modern look into Kentucky’s ‘dry’ counties – which still practice prohibition – suggest that while these areas experience a reduction in alcohol usage, they also experience a terrifying rise in the prevalence of meth labs.

Unfortunately, a ban on cannabis also seems to signal a rise in use of more harmful drugs. There is indication that, in areas where cannabis supply is limited, some users will begin to smoke synthetic cannabinoids – unsafe, unregulated, artificial drugs which can often be purchased legally.

Related

Synthetic Cannabinoids: Growing Side Effects Make Now a Great Time to Stay Away

Conversely, it seems as if legalizing cannabis leads to lowered rates of drug abuse. A nationwide study recently concluded that MMJ states experienced a reduction in opioid deaths by nearly a quarter. Another study found that doctors allowed to prescribe medical cannabis wrote an average of 1,826 fewer opiate prescriptions per year.

4. Economic Impact

Franklin D. Roosevelt signing Cullen-Harrison Act during alcohol prohibition

At a desk in the cabinet room President Franklin D. Roosevelt signs the Cullen-Harrison Act, or “Beer Bill,” the first relaxation of the Volstead Act in all the years of prohibition, March 22, 1933, in Washington. With its signature, the new law will permit the sale of beer and wine containing 3.2% alcohol from midnight of April 6. (AP Photo)

Bringing back booze was ultimately an economic decision. In the midst of the Great Depression, the prospect of an entirely new, booming industry was simply too good to pass up. In 1933, the newly elected Franklin D. Roosevelt signed the legislation repealing the amendment, famously remarking, “I think this would be a good time for a beer.”

The United States is still recovering from a global economic crisis, and the revenue and career opportunities of a legal cannabis industry spell out hope for many. Legal states reported record high earnings in 2016, with Colorado selling more than $1 billion worth of cannabis, and some figures estimating that the plant would generate $18 billion in the U.S. by 2020.

Related

Data Dive: Legalization No Longer a Partisan Issue, Election Data Show

Over the next four years, citizens must demand that future policy be based on informed judgment, rather than impartial bias. We have the capacity to generate a larger job market, prevent drug-related deaths, and come to the aid of medical patients, but first we must make the decision to stop repeating the mistakes of our past.

Serene Desiree's Bio Image

Serene Desiree

Serene Desiree is a standup comedian, freelance writer, and (very) amateur historian. Follow her silly ramblings on Twitter @SDezzles.

View Serene Desiree's articles

  • malcolmkyle

    Prohibition caused the crash of 29

    On Monday, February 10, 1929, New York newspapers proudly announced liquor conspiracy indictments against 31 corporations and 158 individuals in Chicago. The liquor ring’s operations allegedly extended through Chicago, St. Louis, Minneapolis, Detroit, Cleveland, New York, Philadelphia, St. Paul, Los Angeles and North Bergen, N.J. with alcohol diversion in the millions of gallons and turnover estimated at over $50 million a year. One of the New York corporations involved, Allied Drug and Chemical, was reportedly headed by bank director Alfred E. Van Horn.

    On that same day, 917 Chicagoans were reported arrested and further declines in wheat prices were announced.

    The great crash came 8 months later. Just 10 years after the start of federal alcohol prohibition. The ratification of the Twenty-first Amendment to the United States Constitution (end of prohibition) came just 4 years later on December 5, 1933.

  • tam

    Thank You S. Desiree for sharing this! I found it interesting.

  • GBAUTO

    Another interesting viewpoint on prohibition- Alcoholics Anonymous doesn’t think that alcohol should be removed from society.
    Think about that for a moment…here is a group of people who have first hand experience of the damage that alcohol has produced in their lives and their families. But…AA realizes that it isn’t the alcohol(or substitute whatever substance) that’s the problem, it’s the alcoholics inability to handle life on life’s terms. I think that the Author is spot-on on the assessment of what prohibition will always produce.

  • Darius A Stokes

    It works great because his example for the regulation of cannabis because it dictates what age limit. The way the product can be merchandise and basically overall safety feel. You can get information on where it is grown what was added on to it who it came from. Then you can trace it back to its source the way some places are now you can’t even find out who even grew a bag of cannabis they brought. If they do it by alcohol regulations it’ll be more defined and more structured and more easier to purchase and get to without the hassle of having to go through it illegal steps. The overall education of it will be better defined. It also entice people to become vendors and open up their own businesses merchandising there own brand of Cannabis. It also seems like we’re going to Cannabis prohibition era now. Like they say is always a healthier way to do things and health isn’t nothing but logical thoughts.

  • patty miller

    In a free society, one would think a person of average intelligence could partake in a plant that can grow in your garden ! Is it because it makes you feel a little better, relieves a little stress, and makes you healthier, and happier, is that the crime ? If a person is only on cannabis,it is beyond improbable that the person would want to do anything to hurt or cause trouble, it is not the nature of cannabis to produce those affects. I believe these are the real reasons cannabis should not be illegal, but the laws created a new industry… drug law enforcement and they don’t want to lose their jobs now; after all aren’t they the respectable ones ? Not the free thinking , pot smoking rebels that should have a job of their liking !! I would love to be a budtender myself, helping people to feel a little better in their situations, now that’s a rewarding job in my opinion !

    • GoWiThaFlo

      Love your comments, Patty! We are not a “free society” in relation to cannabis plants, and here’s why, according to the brave souls at illegallyhealed dot com: Basically, for 80 years (1937-2017), the federal government has been outright lying to the American people about “marihuana” (seedless, female cannabis flowers) as a means to guarantee profits for the wealthy few. By now everybody’s heard of Patent #6,630,507, “Cannabinoids as Antioxidants and Neuroprotectants,” finalized in 2003 on behalf of the federal Dept. of Health and Human Services. Well, researchers at illegallyhealed did some digging right before Election Day, and found that it’s just 1 of about 400 different federal patents proving that “marihuana” is medicine—much of the research behind those patents was funded by grant money (read: taxpayers) in clear violation of Schedule I law. The feds have substantial investment stakes in those 400 patents in brazen collusion with private banks and pharmaceutical companies, which appears to be the main reason Schedule I “marihuana” law has barely changed in its 46 years of existence. Meanwhile, taxpayers are forced to keep shelling out billions year after year to fund anti-“marihuana” law enforcement in all 50 states, and there appears to be no chance of halting such fraud and hypocrisy anytime soon.

  • Chip Casey

    The point that this article made is well presented. The war on drugs is expensive and largely a failure. The mark of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and in the same way but expecting different results. Cannabis Sativa is illegal because it threatens many wealthy and powerful people who make income contrary to what it does for people all the way from big pharma to alcohol and tobacco. Nothing is going to change quickly until we get someone in office who isn’t beholden to them for their election and is willing to break that cycle. They are also going to have to break the negative news hype because those same wealthy and powerful people control the news and almost always report Cannabis in a negative light.