Refresh Checked Unchecked Menu Search Shopping bag Geolocation Person Facebook Instagram Twitter YouTube Info Icon CBC Icon CBC Shape CBD Icon CBD Shape CBG Icon CBG Shape THC Icon THC Shape THCV Icon THCV Shape
Advertise on Leafly

California’s Final Cannabis Rules: 8 Things to Know

January 23, 2019
(Leafly)
California crossed a major milestone Jan. 16 with the final approval of the state’s permanent commercial cannabis regulations.

Effective immediately, the Golden State’s thousands of licensed farms, retailers, edibles kitchens, and testing labs must follow 358 pages of now-final rules. Most businesses had been following temporary “emergency” rules, but the state’s final rules have been rubber-stamped by the Office of Administrative Law, the last step before they take effect.

What does all this mean for the consumer? Here’s what you need to know:

Delivery For All

All Californians 21 and over can access legal cannabis in the form of legal statewide delivery services. There are more than 100 state-licensed “non-storefront” delivery companies.

The statewide delivery rule codifies existing reality. It ensures millions of Californians who voted for Proposition 64 can legally obtain taxed and tested cannabis, even in a “ban town.”

California is unique among all ten legal states in allowing statewide delivery. Washington doesn’t have it. Neither do Oregon, Nevada, Alaska, or Massachusetts.

Increased Competition

There’s little question the decision will be good for consumers—and not just the ones in towns that ban dispensaries. Instead of a limited number of local shops, consumers can compare price and quality among dozens of deliverers.

“This is a diverse industry, and consumers deserve diverse vehicles by which to gain access,” said Josh Drayton, communications director for the California Cannabis Industry Association.

Maximillian Mikalonis, a cannabis lobbyist for K Street Consulting, fought to have the delivery rule adopted. He doesn’t think competition will be bad for local shops: “Rather, it will allow regulated delivery licensees to compete with the unlicensed market that already exists and undermines the licensed storefronts.”

Drayton said he’s never heard any retailer complain about the rule. He noted that the CCIA’s Retail/Delivery Committee expressed unanimous support for the rule.

“We’re more focused on the competition of the illicit market, as opposed to licensed operators,” he said.

Statewide delivery gives consumers a better option than the illicit market, which thrives because about three-quarters of California municipalities ban licensed cannabis stores. Allowing delivery statewide also makes it easier for medical cannabis patients to get the relief they need.

Mikalonis notes that, legal or not, deliveries are happening. It’s better they should be legal. “You can’t ban delivery,” he said. “You can only ban legal, licensed, regulated, and taxed delivery.”

Delivery Has Opponents

Opponents of the rule might go to court to have it nixed. But it’s not clear a lawsuit would succeed. The state “would not have gone this far without feeling sure of their legal footing,” says Mikalonis.

Some local retailers, regulators, and other groups don’t want statewide delivery. Outside delivery mutes the effect of local oligopolies that many cities tried to erect.

The most vocal opponents of the rule are the League of California Cities, the California Police Chiefs Association, and the United Food and Commercial Workers Western States Council, which counts a few cannabis retail workers among its members.

The League wants cities to have total control, but state regulations on delivery are pretty tight, especially regarding security. Cities also still control the time, place, and manner of deliveries — and can demand extra security on top of the state’s rules.

Police groups believe allowing pot deliveries will increase crime, though they haven’t demonstrated why they think so.

And some unionized cannabis stores did not want to compete with statewide deliverers.

Questions about the rules? Attend the International Cannabis Business Conference Feb. 8 in San Francisco — sponsored by Leafly

Child-Resistant Packaging Here To Stay

California consumers love to carp about child-resistant packaging. The difficulty of opening! The tons of trash junking up the environment!

Well, keeping kids away from THC is here to stay. The final rules mandate child-resistant packaging — at minimum that means a large, opaque, $1 zip-lock “exit” bag filled with your goods. Individual cannabis product packages like candy bars need not be child-resistant until Jan. 1, 2020.

This settles the packaging debate for now, says Sean Donahoe, an industry consultant who is starting a delivery service in San Luis Obispo. “They’ve committed to what they’ve had before.”

It’s confusing, “but once 2020 hits, all items will need to be in a child-resistant package before it goes to retail and there will no longer be a need for child-resistant ‘exit’ bags,” notes Jennifer Price, director of state compliance at Golden State Government Relations.

Pro tip: Re-use your exit bags to save a buck and help the environment. And read the packaging’s directions to open.

Lab Testing Remains Strict

Labeling and purity standards for cannabis will stay super-strict under final regulations.

Consumers can expect more of the cleanest flower, tightly dosed edibles, and purest extracts ever. But those rules will add costs and limit some supplies as growers, chefs, hash-makers, and labs ensure a clean supply chain.

On Jan. 1, 2019, tighter testing rules for heavy metals and toxins went into effect. Some brands that sell disposable vaporizer cartridges filled with extract report that their carts have failed tests for heavy metals. Hash makers don’t think the metal is in the cannabis oil. They blame cartridges from China, which might be failing for heavy metals, said David Hua, CEO of cannabis software company Meadow, and a CCIA board member.

“We’re seeing lead be a big issue in some of these cartridges that are coming in from China,” he said.

Also, the standard one-gram jar of hash has a plastic cap with an inner liner that industry officials say is causing some hash to fail for purity.

Last July 1, shelves up and down the state went bare for weeks as supply chains rebooted to meet strict new lab testing standards. The biggest issue was accurate potency labeling. The new lab rules that went into effect Jan. 1 should not hit consumers as hard. “We’re going to see some issues on the concentrate side, but not as bad as we saw on July 1,” Hua said.

Questions about the rules? Attend the International Cannabis Business Conference Feb. 8 in San Francisco — sponsored by Leafly

No State Tax Relief

Consumers gripe about the state and local taxes that can run 40% higher than the illicit market. The final rules do nothing to curtail those taxes — which can only be decreased by the state legislature.

Cannabis tax reform died last year, but is expected to return in this legislative session. California Democrats have a super-majority in the legislature, setting up a fight between tax-relief Dems, and more traditional tax-and-spend Dems.

One upside: some local sales and excise tax rates are starting to decline as cities begin to compete for cannabis businesses and customers. Neighboring Berkeley and Oakland are competing on sales tax now. Southern California’s rural cities are advertising zero-percent excise taxes to attract industry.

Still Cash-Only

There are no banking fixes in the final state regulations. That’s beyond the power of the BCC. Bring cash, or prepare for high ATM fees, or weird ATM-at-the-register payments.

The national banking system is controlled by the United States Department of Treasury, where cannabis prohibition remains alive and well. California and its big cities have proven loathe to start their own cannabis banks. Voters must support the STATES Act in Congress this year if they want to go cashless.

Related

Cannabis Price Collapse Putting Billions in Consumers’ Pockets

More Equity Licensing

Many consumers want those who bore the brunt of the drug war’s negative effects to benefit from legalized cannabis.

The state’s final rules allow the Bureau of Cannabis Control to better focus on implementing its $10 million equity grant program to local cities and counties. The BCC will release its application form for cities and counties to get equity grants from a $10 million state fund. Equity and many other system improvements had previously been bottlenecked behind final rules and annual licensing, said Hua.

Related

Oakland Cannabis Equity Program Yields First Retailer—Blunts + Moore

More Stores, Products and Services

Expect more store openings, product launches, and cannabis events in 2019. Final rules give cannabis business operators increased certainty. That’s good because uncertainty has been the death of thousands of businesses.

Local opposition to licensing has already killed more minority-owned and small businesses than any equity program will ever save, Hua notes.

“Last year was pretty traumatizing,” said Hua. “This year is about stabilization.”

We’ll likely see more investors who’ve been waiting on the sidelines now jump in to better capitalize existing business and create new ones.

Rules will be stable from one legislative cycle to the next, and with certainty comes collaboration. “We’re seeing lots of opportunities now, looking at how things are done collaboratively across the supply chain,” Hua said.

Related

California Governor OKs Way More Cannabis Events

Child-resistant exit bags are here to stay in the final rules. Above, a customer shops Harvest at in San Francisco. (Jamie Soja for Leafly)

Data security rules improved in California’s final rules. Above, a customer shops at Harvest in San Francisco. (Jamie Soja for Leafly)

Better Personal Data Protection

Wary about giving all your data to cannabis retailers? The state of California heard you.

They loosened the rules so that ordering cannabis can be done with more anonymity. Soon, the retail experience could feel more akin to a convenience store than a hospital visit.

The state used to require retailers to record customer names and put that information in their records. Not anymore. “Dispensaries can still do that if they want to, but they are not required to do it,” Hua said.

Dispensaries must still check IDs to make sure you’re over 21. They must also combat trafficking by enforcing maximum purchase limits, like one ounce per person, per day.

But they need not track you over time.

With final rules set, attention now turns to the state legislature, where new bills covering compassionate use as well as law enforcement are expected to be introduced.

David Downs & Dan Mitchell's Bio Image

David Downs & Dan Mitchell

View David Downs & Dan Mitchell's articles

  • Hep Yo

    The Child-resistant packaging is quite understandable, since the main objection to cannabis is parents’ concern about children (hence “DARE”). However, it seems to be an IQ test, rather than child-resistant. I’m willing to bet that a 120 IQ ten year old can open any of the packaging, and that an 80 IQ forty year old cannot open any of it. I see adult friends who merely cut the tops off those child-resistant bags with a scissors. 🙂

  • Open Minds

    What the BCC and the California legislature need to focus on is the enormous amount of illegal dispensaries that are still open. Not only do they undermine legal dispensaries (and the taxes they generate for the state and cities) but they are also a conduit for selling products containing pesticides & heavy metals. And here is the real problem – the average consumer cannot tell the difference between a legal and illegal dispensary. They think that because it’s legal now, then all dispensaries must be legal dispensaries.

  • Robert Calkin

    The license will/must be posted in a legal dispensary and the license number will/must be listed on any advertisement.