Refresh Checked Unchecked Menu Search Shopping bag Geolocation Person Facebook Instagram Twitter YouTube Info Icon CBC Icon CBC Shape CBD Icon CBD Shape CBG Icon CBG Shape THC Icon THC Shape THCV Icon THCV Shape Loading…
Advertise on Leafly

Rick Steves Tells Us What He’s About to Tell Congress

February 13, 2018
(Elaine Thompson/AP)
Rick Steves is the internationally renowned travel writer and TV personality known for his PBS travel shows, his “Europe Through the Back Door” book series, and his passionate cannabis activism. This afternoon, Steves joins the Congressional Cannabis Caucus to brief Congress on US marijuana policy. In advance of the briefing, Steves fielded a few questions.

DAVID SCHMADER: You’ve mentioned that you’ve been inspired by Europe’s pragmatic approach to drug abuse. Can you tell me a little about what’s impressed you?

“America locks up 10 times as many people as they do in Europe, and we are either inherently a more criminal people or there’s something screwed about our laws.”

RICK STEVES: The line I love that my European friends use is that society has to make a choice—tolerate alternative lifestyles, or build more prisons. And Europeans are really into toleration, they’re into civil liberties, and they’re into not incarcerating people. They always remind me that America locks up 10 times as many people as they do in Europe, and we are either inherently a more criminal people or there’s something screwed about our laws.

You don’t need to lock up so many people for smoking pot and Europeans have showed us that. You can take the crime out of the equation, save a lot of money, and have more credibility when it comes to teachers, parents, and law enforcement teaching young people about the dangers of hard drugs.

Related

In LA, Legal Cannabis Stores Call for Crackdown on Illegal Pop-Ups

Part of your congressional briefing will involve highlighting the benefits that come with moving towards legalization—can you tell me about some of those?

Well, I live in Washington State, and we’re enjoying the benefits that come with legalizing and regulation since we did just that in 2012.

Back then, we passed this bill on a hunch that youth use would not go up, that crime would not go up, that DUIs would not go up. Now we have a track record and it’s really clear—the Washington State Liquor and Cannabis Board has studied it, and use is the same among adults, use has clearly not gone up among youth, DUIs have not been a concern, and crime has not gone up.

“I always stress that this is not pro-marijuana—this is anti-prohibition and pro-smart law.”

What’s gone up is the civil liberty to enjoy marijuana responsibly in your home as an adult. What’s also gone up is tax revenue. Our state has $310 million in tax revenue a year because of legal marijuana.

It’s not because more people are smoking pot, but because we’ve taken a thriving black-market industry that rivaled apples—in Washington, that’s a big deal—and we have turned it into a highly taxed and regulated legal market, which employs tens of thousands of people in our state legally.

In so many cases, politicians find themselves in states that have legalized marijuana because of the will of the people. These politicians who were ambivalent about it or against it, have come to realize, “Hey, this is smart policy.”

And I always stress that this is not pro-marijuana—this is anti-prohibition and pro-smart law, along with tackling the racism that is part of our prohibition against marijuana.

Related

Jeff Sessions Is Steamed Over Senator’s Cannabis Blockade

Another item on your congressional to-do list: highlighting the pending legislative remedies available to correct the wrongs of cannabis prohibition. Can you tell me about those?

Right now there are all sorts of issues. I’m visiting Capitol Hill for the federal government and I’m visiting a number of state houses.

We’ve pretty much exhausted the states that are likely to legalize, tax, and regulate marijuana through the initiative process, and we’re moving into the state houses of the more progressive states, along the eastern seaboard.

“The pot prohibition profiteers—interests that make a lot of money by keeping marijuana illegal—are confusing legislators, and I just think it’s fun to come and share the actual results of what’s happened in (legalized) states.”

A couple years ago, we legalized, taxed, and regulated marijuana in Maine and Massachusetts, and now all the states nearby are realizing “Hey, these other states are getting all the economic benefits of legalizing marijuana,” and people are realizing they better get on board they’re going to be left in the dust.

The question is: How do they do it? I’m not a policy wonk, I don’t know all the banking issues, and DUI issues, but I just can share my general feeling that prohibition is wrong-minded, it’s expensive, it’s counterproductive, and it’s not working.

I really like the sentiment New York Mayor LaGuardia shared back when his state was trying to fight alcohol prohibition: “When a society has a law on the books that it does not intend to enforce consistently across the board, the very existence of that law erodes respect for law enforcement in general.” That’s what we’ve got in the US right now.

Colorado’s tourism is thriving, they’ve got a hot job market, a housing market that’s doing great, and it’s not because of marijuana, but it proves that marijuana doesn’t get in the way of that. People are learning.

Our opponents are really good at cherry-picking statistics generated by organizations whose mission is to discredit the legalization moment with misinformation. Opponents funded by what I call the PPP—the Pot Prohibition Profiteers, interests that make a lot of money by keeping marijuana illegal—are confusing legislators and decision-makers, and I just think it’s fun to come and share the actual results of what happened in the states when they decided to take the crime out of the equation and recognize the civil liberty to enjoy marijuana responsibly in a recreational way.

Related

Sessions Advisor Ramping up Drug War, Profiting From Drug Tests

Final question: Is today’s briefing the most high-profile cannabis activism you’ve yet undertaken?

“(Cannabis) is an issue that I can speak comfortably and openly about because I can’t be fired and nobody needs to vote for me.”

Not really, I go all around the country giving these talks, and I’ve been coming to congress before on this issue. I work it into all my talks, by sharing the perspective I’ve gained from traveling.

Every two years I go on the road to raise awareness—sometimes I talk to the public, other times to legislators. It’s just something I feel is a good contribution from me as a citizen. This is an issue I care about, it’s an issue where I can share a European sensibility, and it’s an issue that I can speak comfortably and openly about because I can’t be fired and nobody needs to vote for me.

Dave Schmader's Bio Image

Dave Schmader

Dave Schmader is the author of the book "Weed: The User's Guide." Follow him on Twitter @davidschmader

View Dave Schmader's articles

  • 360dunk

    ….not to mention I can walk into a dispensary in my state and feel comfortable knowing the products I buy have been tested for molds, pesticides, potency, etc.

    I also feel better knowing my purchase helps school kids here and does NOT help a drug cartel.

    • Mr. Lucas Brice
      • Kelvin Smith

        You cannot know that.

        • Mr. Lucas Brice

          I cannot know what?

      • Colleen Renken

        Read the WHOLE ARTICLE!!

      • E.L. Bl/Du

        your article speaks of Calif. not the rest of the country or world. The reason why it hasnt been tested in the past is b.c of the black market and stringent laws to growers. (prison- 1 -10yr min) they have to get em in and out FAST! You just got legal, so now it will be safer (until tobacco starts w. the GMO weed they;re already cooking up) Just help us all by promoting LEGALIZATION so we can grow our OWN, not big pharma or BIG operations that use chemicals.

        • Mr. Lucas Brice

          California has had legal medical marijuana for many years. The article talks about testing samples from dispensaries, not street drugs.

          • E.L. Bl/Du

            DUH! that was my point. YOUR article ONLY talks about CALIF! NOT the rest of the country. Rec JUST PASSED in your state! Prior to that, recreational users didnt get TESTED product. They HAD to go to the black market. WHO knows what chemicals YOU have been ingesting. That is my point! YOUR article ONLY addresses YOUR state. In other legal states (recreational also) they send back or reject any samples NOT tested, its YOUR laws and comfort that has been misplaced, not the rest of the country. Only your world where gmos flourish and BIG commercial grows are allowed to get away with that…Its all about WHO has the money to get it past the person pedaling inferior product in states where it is not regulated IE CALIFORNIA where rec just got legal. Part of RS article is that we ALL have the right to have SAFE product.

  • MV 1967

    Go Rick, Go!!

    • Jeffrey Simpson

      Thank you Steve.

  • JBF

    Thank you, Mr. Steves, for continuing to lend your powerful, rational voice to this cause. Those of us at the front lines of the medical cannabis movement would also appreciate the following minor changes to the discourse:

    Can we please call it CANNABIS. Not pot, weed, or the m-word that triggers so many negative connotations. The scientific name is: cannabis
    .

    • ONowhere

      The m-word is racist, while the others are not – at least not to my knowledge. Pot, weed, cannabis, ganja, call it what you will, but I agree about the m-word. That’s probably what has Sessions’ panties so twisted around his little thing – he thinks it’s a drug for used mainly by black people, since, you know, “most of the people in prison are there for smoking marijuana.”

  • farmerlion

    This is a great article! Rick Steve’s what you are doing will bless millions of people . Thank you for your kindness, time and efforts . God Bless!

  • lovingc

    Don’t just talk to the Cannabis caucus talk to the hard heads in a way that they will understand. The prohibition of cannabis has gone on since the 30’s and has done nothing but increase the use and sales of cannabis as well as the prices. While legalization has protected the children by not selling to them and the longer the legalization continues the fewer children will be using. The what about the children argument is really popular with ignorant people. They seem to think that cannabis is not already there, but children have access through the black market.

  • sagey

    Some day we will have a President unwilling to pander to the Pentecostals, the Police, or Big Pharma! I live for that day… Thank you Rick Steve’s!!! https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/728804bb90d5b8c94183c40bef1ba1ecf9bf9207c464d26dae9979093d54a30a.png

  • jerry withers

    ask ur congressman & senators to push for legislation to reclassify marijuana from schedule 1 to schedule 2.they should be reclassified as ball less wonders

  • tropicalday88

    Thank you Steve. Please continue to try and educate. The two things I find most frustrating of the obstructionist is their hypocrisy and refusal to entertain any new information regarding legalization. They are all about states rights as blessed by the constitution and fundamental to freedom, you know as long as it’s totally in line with their view freedom. Even with their position now firmly in the minority. Even in the face of actual evidence over heavily stereotyped anecdotal perceptions. How do they feel about their position when the two major groups funding their fight are the adult beverage (alcohol) and pharmaceutical industries? What is the correct term for individuals that refuse to process new information? Wantonly ignorant? Stupid? Lighten up Francis, No one is going to force you to smoke cannabis. Although, you might want to sneak off in to your private study and burn a blunt. You might just be surprised at how good you feel… If you haven’t already.