Refresh Checked Unchecked Menu Search Shopping bag Geolocation Person Facebook Instagram Twitter YouTube Info Icon CBC Icon CBC Shape CBD Icon CBD Shape CBG Icon CBG Shape THC Icon THC Shape THCV Icon THCV Shape Loading…

Arizona May Finally Begin Lab Testing Medical Cannabis for Contaminants

January 29, 2018
Cannabis samples await testing at CannTest, the first commercial marijuana testing laboratory to open in Alaska, in this photo from Oct. 24, 2016. (Dan Joling/AP)
More than seven years after Arizona legalized medical cannabis, the state may finally begin to require lab testing to identify mold, pesticides, and other potentially harmful contaminants.

Under a proposal from state Sen. Sonny Borelli (R-Lake Havasu), the state would require testing starting in 2019. The bill would mandate that products be analyzed for mold and other chemicals and that product labels disclose all compounds used during production.

“This is supposed to be medicine,” Borelli told a local CBS affiliate. “The patient has the right to know what’s in their medicine.”


Pesticides 101: questions and answers for cannabis patients and consumers

The measure, Senate Bill 1420, has earned broad backing from lawmakers, with nearly the entire state Legislature having signed on in support. It now has 78 co-sponsors, including Republican and Democratic leaders in both the House and Senate. There are 90 members of the Legislature.

The bill would also reduce the state’s $150 patient-registration fee to $50.

Borelli said the bill would also require accurate labeling of THC content. “If they’re going to advertise 20% THC and it gets tested at 5%, they need to re-label,” he told CBS. The text of Borelli’s bill, however, makes no specific mention of potency, THC, or other cannabinoids. Nor does it set specific limits on contaminants aside from the requirement that a sample “does not include mold.”

To pay for the testing, the state would appropriate $2 million from its medical marijuana fund surplus, which currently has a balance of $35 million. The money would go to the Department of Agriculture, which could then conduct testing itself or contract the testing out to a qualified third-party lab.

The bill would also reduce the state’s $150 patient-registration fee to $50, with renewals priced at $25. Borelli said the higher fee could no longer be justified in light of the fund surplus.


What Makes a Medical Cannabis Program Succeed?

Most states that have legalized cannabis for adult use have put in place some sort of testing protocol. But ironically, in states where cannabis is allowed only for medical use, testing is often voluntary, poorly enforced, or simply not done. That can put patients at risk, especially those with conditions that weaken their immune systems.

In California, for example, two leukemia patients who used cannabis developed severe lung infections due to a rare fungus. One patient died as the result. While the infections couldn’t definitively be connected to the cannabis they consumed, subsequent testing discovered the same fungus on cannabis purchased at nearby dispensaries.

“We never suspected cannabis use,” said Dr. Joseph Tuscano, an oncologist and researcher at the University of California, Davis, who published an article about the infections. “But after I interviewed the patient, one of the common links was the use of medical marijuana.”


Leafly Investigation: California Has a Dirty Cannabis Problem

Under the Arizona measure, medical cannabis product manufacturers would be required to list all the chemical agents used on that product. Samples of the product would then be collected by either the state or a third-party contractor and tested to be sure the results match the product label. The lab would also perform tests to look specifically for mold.

“From an industry perspective I am certainly not opposed to it,” said Laura Bianchi, who heads the cannabis department at Scottsdale-based Rose Law Group and represents companies growing, distributing, and selling medical cannabis. “In fact I think testing requirements are an important component of any medical product.”

To prevent contamination during storage, the bill would also allow state regulators to inspect dispensaries and warehouses to ensure sanitary conditions.

Under state law, the Legislature needs to muster a three-fourths supermajority in both the House and the Senate. Borelli told CBS last week he’s “actually very confident we will be able to get this accomplished.”

The state Senate’s committee on government is slated to consider the bill on Thursday.


Leafly Investigation: Is Washington’s Top Cannabis Lab Inflating THC Numbers?

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Ben Adlin's Bio Image

Ben Adlin

Ben Adlin is a Seattle-based writer and editor who specializes in cannabis politics and law. He was a news editor for Leafly from 2015-2019. Follow him on Twitter: @badlin

View Ben Adlin's articles

  • Shelly Conrad Ray

    “To prevent contamination during storage, the bill would also allow state regulators to inspect dispensaries and warehouses to ensure sanitary conditions,” sounds intrusive at that point. The surplus of 35 million that was collected through 7 yrs is excess of what it actually cost to process the medical cards, and once it’s used up to test and fees are lowered, what $ will be used to do further testing?

  • This is a pro-industry bill – NOT a health and safety bill. The Arizona Legislature has good intentions, but the industry has clearly taken advantage of their lack of knowledge. This bill requires testing for mold only… What about the harmful chemicals that have been the driving force behind every cannabis recall across the country? What’s with keeping lab results a secret? Why can’t test results be shared with anyone besides the person submitting the sample? If a restaurant doesn’t pass its health and safety inspection – they get a lower score and are put on a publicly available list. Not cannabis business though – no transparency with the folks who are producing “medicines”.

  • Juan Dope

    The only thing that will help is forcing these crappy producers to disclose EVERYTHING they use. I don’t care if they test for 3 rare types of mold. They will probably demonize beneficial microbial strains native to the plant, and allow Powdery Mildew. I guarantee the dispensaries won’t do the right thing, they’ve proven that. They’ve had long enough and have shown their intentions. The Cannabis they ‘grow’ isn’t hardly a plant anymore. Completely unnatural and tainted with chemicals.

    There are more harmful pesticides than I can count. More disgusting scented fertilizer additives than you can imagine. I guarantee the dispensaries have the say in what’s tested for and what’s not. The majority of AZ Cannabis is contaminated with grow products. Fertilizers, sugars, ornamental rose hardeners, pesticides, and perfume products. They will never disclose all of this. If people knew the cocktail of crap they were smoking, they’d sue.

    The local conglomo producers have decided to grow like this for a reason. I have visited several dispensaries that claim to be organic, but are very obviously not. The entire industry is based on lies, whatever you want to categorize them as. Marketing perhaps. “Lab tested”, just another marketing term. While the bud is full of the same additives it is now.

    None of this regulation is going to keep quality in check. The customer base is too remedial. The only thing that will help is separating grow and distribution licenses, and let small operations provide to the retailer, not allowing the retailer exclusive production rights in such an ignorant market. People have been completely taken advantage of by corporate interests.

    Az MMJ cardholders have been guinea pigs for the emerging commercial Cannabis industry. I have not even smelled natural Cannabis aromas in the last several dispensaries I’ve visited. Its a completely artificially grown chemically tainted hydroponic product.

    Quality is not a concern with vertically integrated operations, never has been never will be.