Refresh Checked Unchecked Menu Search Shopping bag Geolocation Person Facebook Instagram Twitter YouTube Info Icon CBC Icon CBC Shape CBD Icon CBD Shape CBG Icon CBG Shape THC Icon THC Shape THCV Icon THCV Shape
Advertise on Leafly

Congressmen Slam Anti-Cannabis Group’s ‘False Claims’ on MMJ Protection

June 29, 2017
On Wednesday evening, one of the nation’s leading anti-cannabis groups issued a press release announcing the “elimination” of a crucial federal protection for state-legal medical cannabis programs. Within hours, however, the group’s announcement had drawn fire from legalization advocates as well as from the so-called Rohrabacher–Blumenauer amendment’s two lead co-sponsors, US Reps. Dana Rohrabacher (R-CA) and Earl Blumenauer (D-OR).

“Marijuana Industry Loses Key Protection from Federal Enforcement in Proposed Spending Bill,” trumpeted Wednesday’s release from the group, Smart Approaches to Marijuana (SAM), which in April submitted testimony to a House subcommittee asking lawmakers to lift the protection.

The group’s leader, Kevin Sabet, then took to Twitter, speculating that “pot investors have to be freaking out” over the apparent development. “It is indeed a new day,” he wrote.

At that point, however, legalization advocates raised a collective eyebrow. Tom Angell, founder of the group Marijuana Majority, responded on Twitter, writing that Sabet and SAM “show extreme ignorance of how Congress works.”

Angell argued that the language in the so-called Rohrabacher–Blumenauer amendment, a federal spending provision that prevents the US Department of Justice from using resources to prosecute state-legal cannabis, “is never in [the] base [budget] bill” but is instead added as an amendment. Sabet, he suggested, had made a mountain out of a molehill.


Anti-Cannabis Group Violated CA Campaign Finance Laws, Commission Finds

Sabet replied that Angell was “wrong,” noting that the provision seemed to be in the base bill for last year, Fiscal 2017. Angell replied by calling SAM and Sabet “inept.”

From there the Twitter war escalated. Like-minded commenters weighed in.

The Drug Policy Alliance’s Office of National Affairs tweeted that “If only [SAM] had hired an experienced Hill staffer, they wouldn’t make mistakes like this anymore.” Scott M. Gagnon, the leader of SAM’s Maine chapter, tweeted that Angell, a reporter at MassRoots, should “stick to the Kylie Jenner fluff pieces.”

“There is no news here.”
US Rep. Earl Blumenauer

Meanwhile, Leafly reached out to Blumenauer’s office in an effort to figure out what was going on. A spokesperson explained that the cannabis amendment has never been in the base appropriations bill. It only appeared to be in the 2017 base bill because that document was a continuation of the 2016 bill—which had been amended to include the Rohrabacher–Blumenauer (then known as Rohrabacher–Farr) provision.

Less than two hours later, Blumenauer and Rohrabacher issued a joint statement to “rebuke false claims regarding critical medical marijuana protections.”


Congress Set to Revive CARERS Act

“The folks at SAM clearly don’t understand the legislative process,” Blumenauer said in a release. “Our amendment has never been in the [subcommittee’s] bill. There is no news here. We are exactly where we thought we would be in the legislative process and look forward to amending the underlying bill once again this year to make sure medical marijuana programs, and the patients who rely on them, are protected.”

On Twitter, he added that “SAM’s complete misrepresentation of the legislative process is entirely consistent with their repeated falsehoods about marijuana.”

But Sabet and SAM refused to back down. On Thursday, the group sent another press release claiming that it was the Congressmen who were misrepresenting the situation because they had sent a letter to the House subcommittee asking for the amendment to be included.

“On April 4, Representatives Rohrabacher and Blumenauer, two Members of Congress funded by illegal marijuana operations selling pot candies to kids, wrote appropriators asking to include their pro-marijuana language in a base spending bill—and they expected to get their way,” Sabet said in the release. “Now, like the fox and the sour grapes, they changed their tune once they didn’t get what they wanted.”

(Sabet also sent a Leafly editor more detailed information to support his procedural claims. His comments are included in full at the end of this article.)


Anti-Cannabis Leader Resigns Over Controversial Tweets About Orlando Massacre

Gagnon, of SAM Maine, sent a tweet to Washington Post reporter Christopher Ingraham doubling down on the accusation that Blumenauer and Rohrabacher have profited from illegal cannabis sales to children. Ingraham replied by asking for documented examples—a request neither Gagnon nor SAM has yet responded to.

A Twitter exchange between legalization opponent Scott Gagnon of SAM Maine and Washington Post reporter Christopher Ingraham

A Twitter exchange between legalization opponent Scott Gagnon of SAM Maine and Washington Post reporter Christopher Ingraham

Some Congressional observers have noted that it’s not uncommon for officials to send such request letters as formalities, even if they don’t necessarily expect to get what they want. In May, US Attorney General Jeff Sessions sent a letter to congressional leaders asking them to oppose the Rohrabacher–Blumenauer protection.

Outside prohibitionist groups, the letter has largely been met with derision. Even Roger Stone, a longtime confidant to President Donald Trump, said “it’s time for [Trump] to tell Attorney General Sessions to cut the shit.”


Leafly Interview: Dirty Trickster Roger Stone Talks Cannabis Legalization & Trump

For his part, Sabet on Thursday morning seemed chuffed to have irked two members of Congress who have been so central to protecting state-legal cannabis.

“Last night we made 2 Congressmen really mad; they devoted press releases to us,” he wrote on Twitter. “Honored.”

Kevin Sabet messaged a Leafly editor to explain his reading of the history behind the cannabis amendment.

Kevin Sabet messaged a Leafly editor to explain his reading of the history behind the cannabis amendment.

Ben Adlin's Bio Image

Ben Adlin

Ben Adlin is a senior editor at Leafly who specializes in politics and the law. Follow him on Twitter: @badlin

View Ben Adlin's articles

  • David James

    I heard Sabet speak in Fountain Valley, Ca so it’s of no surprise to me that his conspirators would lie and lie again to support their prohibitionist ideas. Most of what Sabet said in Fountain Valley was lies.

    • Gary Craig

      Good lord I can’t stand that smug liar!

    • lovingc

      Lies are all they have, the truth will never help them.

  • Kelvin McCabe

    I like how Sabet has the temerity to think he knows more than the legislators who actually got the amendment inserted into past bills and successfully passed it. Sour grapes? Psssshhh. How bout some more “whine” ya dipshits at project SAM. The pimple on the ass of history needs popped.

  • familyguy

    Mr Stone is correct it’s time to cut the shit. This is an industry ready to produce jobs, revenue in the billions and better approval ratings for a president that really keeps shooting himself in the foot. Driverless car will so take over the auto industry that will eliminate drugged or drunk drive and all other driving offenses. It is tome to think of news revenue that people are more than willing to pay.

  • noah vail

    is this the same Kevin that is so notorious at the glory holes whenever he’s in D.C….? just wondering…

  • Lou

    Sabet mentions that Rohrabacher and Blumenauer are funded by “llegal marijuana operations selling pot candies to kids”. But I’d like to know who’s funding SAM. (Note that SAM was recently fined by California for campaign finance violations, and keeps its funders’ identities close to the vest.) Fentinyl manufacturer Insys Therapeutics dropped $500,000 on Arizonans for Responsible Drug Policy, a group that successfully fought legalization in Arizona last year. They stand to lose a lot with legalization, and it couldn’t happen to a nicer bunch of drug lords. I read that casino magnate Sheldon Adelson contributes to the wrong side too. Of course, Shelly stands to lose a lot of revenue; legalization will very likely result in his customers’ drinking less free hootch in his gambling sewers. Drunks are stupid and casinos ply them with lots of free drinks. Stoners (speaking generally) not so much. Drunks are far more likely to bet the family’s egg money on #23 than are weed enthusiasts.
    It’s 100% about the money.

    • Gary Craig

      The hypocrisy of Sheldon “ShellyFunBucks” Adelson is that he supports medical cannabis for Israel, which I find amusing. No casinos in Israel, I suppose. Thus no money in keeping it illegal there. I wish these people would dry out and blow away!

    • Gary Craig

      “Yes kids, come into the dispensary for your cannabis gummy bears. But first I’ll need to see some i.d. for age verification.” Street dealers do NOT ask for ID. I wish Kevin Sabet would go away, and take that idiot Patrick Kennedy with him.

  • Fuctifino

    This is awesome, this is like watching Frank Burns and Margaret Houlihan during that episode on MASH where they banned alcohol. First things first is that this guy should be banned from calling himself a “doctor”.

    Second is that he should stop telling people who are 70+ years old who fought in the Vietnam war that marijuana isn’t good for them. Being that they fought for this country and served it, unlike Kevin Sabet, I believe they have a bit more credibility to speak about the impact of marijuana than a 38 year old chubby overweight suburbanite who’s never served his country a day in his life.