Refresh Checked Unchecked Menu Search Shopping bag Geolocation Person Facebook Instagram Twitter YouTube Info Icon CBC Icon CBC Shape CBD Icon CBD Shape CBG Icon CBG Shape THC Icon THC Shape THCV Icon THCV Shape Loading…
CBDScience & tech

Peak THC: The Limits on THC and CBD Levels for Cannabis Strains

March 21, 2017

Peak THC: The Limits on THC and CBD Levels for Cannabis Strains

For decades, growers have used selective breeding to create strains with ever-higher levels of THC. Some have done the same to produce low-THC, high-CBD profiles. But is there a limit on the THC or CBD levels that cannabis can produce? Or will growers continue to pack more power per pound into the plant?

The answer is simple: There are limits. And today’s growers have probably already reached the natural limits with the most potent THC-dominant and CBD-dominant strains.

Because CBD and THC are ultimately derived from CBGA, and strain genetics limit how that happens, there are serious biological constraints on the THC:CBD ratios that strains can have. You can see this clearly by looking at a plot of THC vs. CBD content across many strains, which will look something like what you see in Figure 1.

Figure 1: THC and CBD levels generally fall within three broad ranges. Almost every strain will fall into one of these. 30% total THC by dry weight should be considered very potent, and it’s difficult to get plants to produce much more than that. Balanced strains will have both CBD and THC, but at intermediate levels. The very center of each trio of rings is the average THC and CBD content for that strain category. Each shade of purple represents one standard deviation. The majority of strains in each category will fall within the innermost, dark purple ring. Note: the THC-dominant rings have been stretched vertically for visualization purposes. (Photo credit: Amy Phung/Leafly)


Lab Data Shows Limits on THC and CBD Levels

The above graphic is based on real data—over 1,200 laboratory measurements from commercial strains in the state of Washington. Almost all strains fall into one of the three shaded regions above. And this isn’t anything new—botanists have known about this general pattern for years, and have used the THC:CBD ratio to classify landrace strains into three “chemotypes.”

Most commercial strains sit near the x-axis in Figure 1—they have high THC content and low or negligible CBD levels. By contrast, hemp strains sit near the y-axis because they produce CBD but very little THC. Balanced strains produce both CBD and THC, so they fall somewhere in the middle. THC-dominant strains make up the bulk of flower products on dispensary shelves, although balanced strains are rising in popularity due to increasing consumer interest in CBD.


Leafly Marketwatch: The Rapid Rise in CBD Interest

What’s also interesting are the blank regions, where you should never expect a commercial strain to fall. In terms of THC content, ~8-10% dry weight marks the low end for common THC-dominant strains (although you can find some with lower levels). The most potent strains clock in at just over 30% THC by dry weight. You can occasionally find some that contain higher levels, but they’re rare.

But there is an upper limit. The biological limits on THC production mean that ~35% total THC by dry weight is a rough upper limit for strains. On average, high-THC strains contain ~18-20% total THC, while the more potent strains will contain ~25-30% total THC. You should almost never see a strain with more than 35% total THC by dry weight. Be skeptical if you do.

(Note: in the next article of this series, we’ll look more closely at what Total THC by % dry weight means, and how to read it on labels.)

Mixed strains are also limited in how much CBD and THC they can produce. They can’t produce as much THC as the more potent THC-dominant strains, and they can’t produce as much CBD as the more potent hemp strains. 20% total CBD by dry weight would be considered highly potent for a hemp strain.


What are the strongest cannabis strains?

Most balanced strains will tend to have CBD and THC levels in the neighborhood of ~6-12%. But you should never see a strain with 30% THC and 10% CBD, or one with 30% of both. The biology of THC and CBD production prevents this. Be skeptical if you see flower claiming to contain anything very far from the shaded purple regions in Figure 1.

Why Do These Limits Exist?

If you think about it, there are commonsense reasons why these limits exist. When appropriately labeled, cannabis products tell you how much THC, CBD, or other compounds are present as a percentage of the dry weight of that product. If the flower you buy is labelled as having 25% THC by dry weight, it means that 25% of the mass of the flower, after it has been dried to remove water, comes from THC. That means 75% of its dry weight comes from other things: fats, carbs, proteins, vitamins, and minerals. All that stuff. More THC or CBD means less of those things, which the plant depends on for survival.


Cannabis anatomy: The parts of the plant

But just knowing the % dry weight number isn’t enough if you want to know exactly how much THC you will really be dealing with when consuming your favorite strain. That’s because a lot of the “THC” in your product is really THCA, much of which will be converted into THC by the heat from your lighter, vape or oven. And this process isn’t 100% efficient, which means things aren’t so cut and dry that you can just read the numbers on the label.

In the next installment of this series, we’ll take a deeper dive into what “Total THC” really means, and how it can be calculated. After that, we’ll explore how the THC:CBD ratio might be used to predict relative differences in effects that different strains may have.


De meijer EP, Bagatta M, Carboni A, et al. The inheritance of chemical phenotype in Cannabis sativa L. Genetics. 2003;163(1):335-46. PDF
Hillig KW, Mahlberg PG. A chemotaxonomic analysis of cannabinoid variation in Cannabis (Cannabaceae). Am J Bot. 2004;91(6):966-75. PDF
Sawler J, Stout JM, Gardner KM, et al. The Genetic Structure of Marijuana and Hemp. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(8):e0133292. PDF
Weiblen GD, Wenger JP, Craft KJ, et al. Gene duplication and divergence affecting drug content in Cannabis sativa. New Phytol. 2015;208(4):1241-50. PDF

Nick Jikomes's Bio Image

Nick Jikomes

Nick is Leafly's principal research scientist and holds a PhD in neuroscience from Harvard University and a B.S. in genetics from the University of Wisconsin-Madison. He has been a professional cannabis researcher and data scientist since 2016.

View Nick Jikomes's articles

4 part series

  • Dig it

  • Thomas Blank

    the practice of drying by heating the sample in an oven drives off not only water but terpenes, and terpenes c an be as high as 6%, so the dry weight potency basis is flawed unless the terpenes are somehow retained during heating(very unlikely). Assay the terpenes before drying, and then after. If the terpenes measured dont go UP as THCA does with the loss of water, you are operating under the assumption that evaporated terpenes ARE water and this will bias the measurement high with a false increase in the potency. The strongest strains can have very high terpenes. SO if you drove all the terpenes off, thetotal THC measurement would be 30*0.05= 1.5% too high. Terpenes can only be measured accurately in situ on a market ready flower @ 9-10% moisturee(3.5% ~ bone dry). SO I would say that around 35% is the top as dry sample but it could be only 33% as market ready. We have seen as high as 34% THCA+THC market ready and precious few over 30%.

    • Thomas Blank

      And also old samples that have lost their terpenes will have higher potency than they did fresh, but the loss of those terpenes actually decreases the psychoacitivity in most cases. Anyone who has cured cannabis knows you can have substantial losses in terpenes at RT overnight in dry air. So yes I question the practice of drying in an oven as it acceleraes the loss of volatile terpenes and thereby tends to give artificially high potencies.

    • We agree Thomas! Over drying in an attempt to get a few more points on THC is detrimental to terpenes, which are more important/interesting than a few THC points.

  • Audrey Hill

    Very interesting and good to know. I have often wondered about these limits but have never found anything as definitive as in this article.

  • It’s true! When we look at the data from our lab, we see the same trend. In fact, there’s more than three groups. As you can see from the graph, it’s pretty easy to pick out at least four groups. If we dig into the data even deeper — and especially if we consider the ratios of terpenes as well — we find there are even more groupings based on chemotype. Really cool!!

  • laura

    Looking forward to the next installment of this series about what total THC means.

  • MoonBam

    Does Cannabis oil come from only the Bud/flower of the plant?

    • Tom Schneider

      The oil / cannabinoids can be found in practically the entire plant, but the buds / flowers have by far the richest concentrations of cannabinoids and terpenes, and the flower also has the lowest relative concentration of undesirable constituents like waxes, chloraphylls. etc, that give the oil a worse flavor and reportedly have made some consumers sick at their stomachs.

  • dianehappylife420

    Check out this site for your cbd oil. It is amazing!! I have so much more energy, and less pain than I did a month ago!

    • Tom Schneider

      please don’t use this space for advertising.

  • Réal Guy

    Informative! I wondered for a long time myself, better late than never.

    It would also prove interesting to map indica vs sativa on that same plot.

  • Jack Lean

    I find the very notion that even ‘dry weight’ levels of 25% being attained to be preposterous.

    Most of the THC extraction methods I have witnessed ‘max out’ well below twenty percent.

    Granted, I haven’t seen ALL the latest top ranked strains extracted and checked for percentage, but I’ve seen entire ounces of Banner, Strawberry Cough and a few Chemdawg variants extracted and the results fall below the ‘magic twenty ceiling.’

    Color me skeptically ‘white.’